EvidenceTable 09504 · Member profile

Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the point beginning “Locate the primary study and confirm that it...

Correction note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: retain the wording beginning “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” i...

Limit of the answer in “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: “Retain units, method, laboratory interval and collection c...

Case 7 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication A cited preprint has a later published version. How should an archive entry handle the relationship...

Case 13 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Correction note for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: retain the wordin...

Case 1 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly A result is described only as statistically significant. What information is missing? E...

Case 34 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the l...

Case 25 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise A transcription error changes the units in a figure caption. How should th...

Case 28 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise Correction note for “A correction log for an archive article”: retain the ...

Case 19 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point beginning “Link both vers...

Put the species or model, design, comparator and measured endpoint before the interpretation. The reader should be able to see what was observed witho...