SourceIndex 09487 · Member profile
The summary should say that different quantities were initially mixed and identify how the revised table separates them. No clinical conclusion follow...
Case 4 — Correlation in a small observational dataset Limit of the answer in “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: “Report sample size, pote...
Case 11 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary s...
Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication status is useful context but is not itself a guarantee ...
Case 31 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Summary draft for “An evidence table with room for negative find...
Case 22 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication Limit of the answer in “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: “Link both versions, record da...
Case 26 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-m...
Case 40 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Correction note for “A correction log that survives the nex...
Case 16 — Correlation in a small observational dataset Summary draft for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the answer addresses “Report ...
Correction note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: retain the wording beginning “Individual decisions belong with a qualified clinicia...