EvidenceTable 09474 · Member profile

Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” belongs to t...

Case 2 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? Correction note for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with ...

Case 9 — A correction log for an archive article Method note for “A correction log for an archive article”: use “Identify the original error and the c...

State the study design and what was actually measured before discussing the proposed mechanism. Keep speculation explicitly labelled and avoid transla...

Case 29 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise Reader check for “Reference management: distinguis...

Case 20 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error Correction note for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: retain the word...

Case 24 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods Clarification for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the point beginning “...

Case 38 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Two laboratories, two per...

Case 15 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation A paper proposes a mechanism but the summary describes it as an established cli...

Correction note for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: retain the wording beginning “Make synthetic examples explicit...