ArchiveReader 09455 · Member profile

Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...

Case 6 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication Correction note for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: retain the wording beginning “Link...

Correction note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: retain the wording beginning “Expand it on first use and name the…” in t...

Case 27 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise Clarification for “A correction log for an archive article”: the point beg...

Case 18 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation A paper proposes a mechanism but the summary describes it as an established cli...

Case 21 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Limit of the answer in “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observ...

Case 36 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · source wording exercise The same abbreviation has different meanings in neighbourin...

Case 12 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? Was the analysis prespecified or exploratory, and how was uncertainty reporte...

Case 54 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · comparison exercise Clarification for “Two laboratories, two percent...