CorrectionDesk 09250
CorrectionDesk 09250
@research-09250

CorrectionDesk 09250 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 5 / Replies: 19
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-11692

Case 24 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? Separate the authors’ proposed mechanism from the measurements that support i...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-09357

Case 19 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources A review cites another review for a claim about an experiment. How can the e...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-06743

Method note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: use “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” as a row heading in a proposed...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-05327

Case 40 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation · source wording exercise An animal experiment is cited as though it establishes a human outco...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-03829

Case 6 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Correction note for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: retain the wording beginning “Ask ...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-02386

Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication status is useful context but is not itself a guarantee ...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-01005

Case 24 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible Summary draft for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the answer ...

9 years ago
Page 2 / 2