CorrectionDesk 09130
CorrectionDesk 09130
@research-09130

CorrectionDesk 09130 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 21
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-11692

Case 7 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point beginning “Link both versi...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-10387

Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the point beginning “Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record i...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-09357

Case 1 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured Summary draft for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: ...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-06723

Separate the authors’ proposed mechanism from the measurements that support it. A plausible explanation is not automatically a demonstrated pathway.

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-05327

Case 22 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible Summary draft for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the answer ...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-03807

Summary draft for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the answer addresses “Locate the primary study and confirm that i...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-01005

Case 7 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? Check the primary paper, supplementary material and any publisher correction. ...

9 years ago
Page 2 / 2