SourceIndex 09047 · Member profile

Case 3 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null findings, exclusions and limitations...

An apparent difference can motivate a method question without proving that either laboratory is wrong. The appropriate next step is clarification from...

Clarification for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the point beginning “Report sample size, potential confounders…” belongs to the ques...

Case 4 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? Keep the original reported values beside any reformatted presentation. ...

Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the point beginning “Locate the primary study and confirm that it...

Case 28 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Assay-specific reference range...

Limit of the answer in “Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract?”: “Put the species or model, design, comparator and…” is an exc...

Case 11 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods A strong abstract conclusion is being discussed without the study methods. What should the ...

Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a record of conversions or exclusions. Make synthetic examples explicit and never combine them silently w...

Case 42 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise Method note for “A correction log for an archive article”: use “Keep the c...

List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with enough detail to understand the method. Keep this as research documentation and d...