EvidenceTable 09014 · Member profile

Identify population, design, comparator, outcome definitions and follow-up. Assess whether the conclusion extends beyond the measurements and note wha...

Reader check for “A correction log for an archive article”: distinguish the discussion point “Keep the correction visible to readers who may have…” fr...

Case 26 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise Correction note for “Two laboratories, two p...

Case 24 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? A reagent dossier contains a summary purity percentage but not the metho...

Method note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: use “State whether it was prespecified and how…” as a row heading in a propos...

Case 6 — A correction log that survives the next archive update Each entry should retain the date, old text, corrected text, reason and source referen...

Method note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: use “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with e...

Case 37 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · source wording exercise Correction note for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparis...

Clarification for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: the point beginning “Expand it on first use and name the…” belongs to the ...