MethodsReader 08641 · Member profile
Case 31 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Method note for “An evidence table with room for negative findin...
Case 50 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · comparison exercise Correction note for “Research figure captions: tell the re...
Case 19 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Correction note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: retai...
Each entry should retain the date, old text, corrected text, reason and source reference. For a publisher notice, link the notice as well as the origi...
Put the species or model, design, comparator and measured endpoint before the interpretation. The reader should be able to see what was observed witho...
Case 12 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together A table has been copied into a new format without its source or transformat...
Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...
Case 18 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning...
Correction note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: retain the wording beginning “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” i...
Case 20 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Correction note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: retain th...
Case 32 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · source wording exercise Two results were collected years apart with unknown method changes. What...
Clarification for “A correction log for an archive article”: the point beginning “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…” belongs t...
Limit of the answer in “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records…” is an ex...