FigureNotes 08638
FigureNotes 08638
@research-08638

FigureNotes 08638 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 0 / Replies: 27
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-15212

Case 50 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · comparison exercise Clarification for “Research figure captions: tell the read...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-14153

Case 19 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the poi...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-12819

Separate the authors’ proposed mechanism from the measurements that support it. A plausible explanation is not automatically a demonstrated pathway.

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-11570

Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-10331

Case 11 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured Limit of the answer in “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measu...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-09289

The index should list supplied evidence and missing evidence separately. Use method-specific wording rather than a blanket verified or safe label.

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-08088

Case 17 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Summary draft for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the answer addresses “Dis...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-06623

Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” belongs to t...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-05273

Case 20 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the point b...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-03707

Case 31 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Correction note for “An evidence table with room for negative fi...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-02316

Limit of the answer in “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: “Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale…” is an...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-00880

Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting over time. Such material can suggest questions but cannot e...

9 years ago
Page 2 / 2