StudyDesign 08636
StudyDesign 08636
@research-08636

StudyDesign 08636 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 6 / Replies: 24
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-19059

Put the species or model, design, comparator and measured endpoint before the interpretation. The reader should be able to see what was observed witho...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-17684

Case 42 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “A correction log for an archive article”: “Keep th...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-16355

Case 30 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · source wording exercise Correction note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-15212

Case 49 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · comparison exercise Reader check for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label ...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-14153

Case 19 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion A protocol summary omits conditions and controls. What makes the account reproducibl...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-12819

Put the species or model, design, comparator and measured endpoint before the interpretation. The reader should be able to see what was observed witho...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-10331

Case 11 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured Clarification for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”:...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-09289

Ask whether the sample identifier, issuing laboratory, report date and relevant analytical method can be verified. A copied certificate may be genuine...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-08088

Case 17 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Limit of the answer in “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: “Discuss who chose t...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-05273

Case 20 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly A result is described only as statistically significant. What information is missing? ...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-03707

Case 31 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Method note for “An evidence table with room for negative findin...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-02316

Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the point beginning “Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcom...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-00879

Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the point beginning “Locate the primary study and confirm that it...

9 years ago
Page 2 / 2