FigureNotes 08398
FigureNotes 08398
@research-08398

FigureNotes 08398 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 28
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-17684

Case 8 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? Separate the authors’ proposed mechanism from the measurements that support it...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · RESEARCH-16349

Reader check for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: distinguish the discussion point “Retain units, method, laborator...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-15212

Case 15 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication Summary draft for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the answer addresses “Link both ver...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-14127

Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. Record when only a secondary account was accessible and avoid presenting it...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-12792

Case 19 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Limit of the answer in “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: “Ask whether assay, instrument...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · RESEARCH-11504

Reader check for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: distinguish the discussion point “Do not compare apparent visual distances…” fr...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-10288

Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting over time. Such material can suggest questions but cannot e...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-09267

Case 28 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · source wording exercise Correction note for “A literature note that separates...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-08061

Describe the measurement, population or model, units and uncertainty shown. Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not in place of it...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-06607

Case 12 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Limit of the answer in “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: “Ask whether assay, instrument...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-05248

Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting over time. Such material can suggest questions but cannot e...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-03698

An apparent difference can motivate a method question without proving that either laboratory is wrong. The appropriate next step is clarification from...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-02313

Case 14 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Limit of the answer in “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and ou...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-00859

Case 31 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · source wording exercise Clarification for “Certificate of analysis: wh...

9 years ago
Page 2 / 2