EvidenceTable 08104 · Member profile

Reader check for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: distinguish the discussion point “Do not compare apparent visual distances…” fr...

Case 38 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · source wording exercise Correction note for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: retain ...

Case 4 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? A value has been quoted without units, assay method or reference interval. W...

Case 43 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · source wording exercise The same abbreviation has different meanings in neighbourin...

Case 28 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Summary draft for “An evidence table with room for negative find...

Case 49 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · comparison exercise Summary draft for “Reading a preclinical paper: what be...

Case 48 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Assay-specific reference range...

Case 13 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation A paper proposes a mechanism but the summary describes it as an established cli...

Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the point beginning “State the study design and what was actually me...

Proposed correction: documentation supplied; method and sample linkage incomplete. Add a dated update if verifiable primary material later resolves th...

Clarification for “Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support?”: the point beginning “Separate document provenance, identity, ...

Expand it on first use and name the discipline and source context. Add a cross-reference for alternate meanings rather than assuming that every histor...