EvidenceTable 08014
EvidenceTable 08014
@research-08014

EvidenceTable 08014 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 22
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-11462

Case 15 — A correction log that survives the next archive update The final note should distinguish corrected data transcription, changed source eviden...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-10203

Case 36 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation · source wording exercise Reader check for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: di...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-09246

Case 35 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · source wording exercise Reader check for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: ...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-08031

Limit of the answer in “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: “Locate the primary study and confirm that it…” is an excerp...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-06528

Reader check for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: distinguish the discussion point “Expand it on first use and name the…” fro...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-05140

Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notice. They have different sources and may affect different claims.

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · RESEARCH-02237

Clarification for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: the point beginning “Retain units, method, laboratory interval a...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Correlation in a small observational dataset · RESEARCH-00823

Reader check for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: distinguish the discussion point “Report sample size, potential confounders…” from it...

9 years ago
Page 2 / 2