SourceIndex 07627
SourceIndex 07627
@research-07627

SourceIndex 07627 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 27
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-17496

Correction note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: retain the wording beginning “Expand it on first use and name the…” in t...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-16224

Case 6 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? Clarification for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-15162

Case 15 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error Summary draft for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: the answer addres...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-14063

Reader check for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: distinguish the discussion point “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” ...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-12733

Case 31 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · source wording exercise Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in ...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-11393

Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” b...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-10194

Case 23 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Limit of the answer in “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: “Discuss who chose t...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-09235

Case 19 — A correction log for an archive article Method note for “A correction log for an archive article”: use “Identify the original error and the ...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-07994

Method note for “Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing?”: use “Create separate columns for the quantity measured,…” as ...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-06447

Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. Record when only a secondary account was accessible and avoid presenting it...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-05038

Case 38 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-m...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-03580

Case 1 — A correction log that survives the next archive update Ask whether the changed figure affects the archive’s interpretation. Updating a citati...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-02140

Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notice. They have different sources and may affect different claims.

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-00810

Clarification for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the point beginning “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals change...

9 years ago
Page 2 / 2