StudyDesign 07526 · Member profile

Case 25 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise Method note for “Data provenance: keep source, tr...

Case 16 — A correction log that survives the next archive update If the source is not accessible, label the revision pending verification. An unavaila...

Case 40 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Two laboratories, two per...

Case 9 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? Create separate columns for the quantity measured, method, units and de...

Case 5 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion A reader asks whether an experimental finding should change their treatment. What is an appropria...

Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the point beginning “Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record i...

Summary draft for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the answer addresses “State the study design and what was actually m...

Case 23 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible Correction note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: retain th...

Keep the original reported values beside any reformatted presentation. A conversion or interpretation needs a documented basis; it should not silently...

Correction note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: retain the wording beginning “State the study design and what was ...

Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable rec...