AssayNotebook 07283 · Member profile
State whether it was prespecified and how many comparisons were considered. Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather than as establi...
Case 6 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample A collection of forum reports is being treated as a representative sample. What limitations be...
Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point beginning “State whether it was prespecified and how…” belongs to...
Case 48 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · source wording exercise Two variables move together in a small sample. What would a careful d...
Case 26 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative find...
Case 5 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and reassess claims that ...
Method note for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: use “Describe the measurement, population or model,…” as a row heading ...
Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...
Correction note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: retain the wording beginning “Expand it on first use and name the…” in t...
Case 2 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation Correction note for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: retain the wording beginni...