AssayNotebook 07263 · Member profile
Method note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: use “Keep speculation explicitly labelled and avoid translating…” as a...
Case 17 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? Create separate columns for the quantity measured, method, units and d...
Case 27 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise Reader check for “Reference management: distinguis...
Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting over time. Such material can suggest questions but cannot e...
Case 55 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · comparison exercise Limit of the answer in “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: “Exp...
Case 3 — A correction log for an archive article Identify the original error and the corrected text, date the correction and link the source. Keep the...
Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable rec...
Case 45 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Clarification for “A correction log that survives the next ...
Case 23 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation Clarification for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: the point beginning “Descri...
Case 2 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discu...
Describe the species, model and outcome actually studied. Differences in biology and study conditions limit translation; the finding is not a clinical...
Method note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: use “State whether it was prespecified and how…” as a row heading in a propos...
Method note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: use “State whether it was prespecified and how…” as a row heading in a propos...