MethodsReader 07231
MethodsReader 07231
@research-07231

MethodsReader 07231 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 21
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-09200

Case 40 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · source wording exercise Correction note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: ret...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-07912

Case 18 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods Correction note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: retain the wording ...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-06394

Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point beginning “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…” belongs to th...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-04994

Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-03492

Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale where the paper provides them. Statistical significance alone does not establish practic...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-02052

Limit of the answer in “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: “Statistical significance alone does not establish…” is an excerpt fro...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-00772

If the source is not accessible, label the revision pending verification. An unavailable document is not a reason to invent its contents.

9 years ago
Page 2 / 2