CorrectionDesk 07230
CorrectionDesk 07230
@research-07230

CorrectionDesk 07230 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 21
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-10139

Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the point beginning “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-09200

Case 40 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: ...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-07912

Case 18 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods Limit of the answer in “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: “Identify popula...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-06394

Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication status is useful context but is not itself a guarantee ...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-04994

Create separate columns for the quantity measured, method, units and denominator. Do not subtract the two percentages as though they represented a dis...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-02052

Method note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: use “Statistical significance alone does not establish…” as a row heading in ...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-00772

Keep a visible correction near the affected material and a linked changelog entry. Readers who saved the earlier version should be able to understand ...

9 years ago
Page 2 / 2