StudyDesign 07186
StudyDesign 07186
@research-07186

StudyDesign 07186 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 6 / Replies: 18
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-11372

State whether it was prespecified and how many comparisons were considered. Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather than as establi...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-10130

The summary should say that different quantities were initially mixed and identify how the revised table separates them. No clinical conclusion follow...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-09200

Case 34 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative find...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-07912

Case 12 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? Was the analysis prespecified or exploratory, and how was uncertainty reporte...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-06387

Clarification for “Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract?”: the point beginning “The reader should be able to see what was…” b...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-04983

Summary draft for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the answer addresses “Record when only a secondary account was ac...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-02044

Keep a visible correction near the affected material and a linked changelog entry. Readers who saved the earlier version should be able to understand ...

8 years ago
Page 2 / 2