CorrectionDesk 06900
CorrectionDesk 06900
@research-06900

CorrectionDesk 06900 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 20
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-09192

Case 38 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise Reader check for “A correction log for an archive article”: distinguish th...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-07851

Separate the authors’ proposed mechanism from the measurements that support it. A plausible explanation is not automatically a demonstrated pathway.

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-06379

Case 17 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the poi...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-04960

Case 11 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? A comparison table places chromatographic purity and net peptide conte...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-03458

Case 30 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · source wording exercise Reader check for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: dist...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-02032

Limit of the answer in “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records…” is an ex...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-00739

Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and reassess claims that relied on the paper. Do not leave the historical citation look...

9 years ago
Page 2 / 2