StudyDesign 06846 · Member profile

Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the point beginning “Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record i...

Case 17 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible Correction note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: retain th...

Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the point beginning “State the study design and what was actually me...

Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed and retain both original reports. Do not infer a physiological trend before assess...

Case 9 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? The summary should say that different quantities were initially mixed a...

Case 31 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · source wording exercise Clarification for “A literature note that separates h...

Reader check for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: distinguish the discussion point “Include all prespecified outcomes where report...

Case 9 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? A human-benefit claim needs appropriate human evidence. This preclinical note ...

Case 3 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Clarification for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the point beginning “Ask whether ass...

Case 23 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Expand it on first use and name the discipline and source context. Add a cross-refere...

Ask whether the sample identifier, issuing laboratory, report date and relevant analytical method can be verified. A copied certificate may be genuine...