AssayNotebook 06623 · Member profile

Reader check for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: distinguish the discussion point “Include all prespecified outcomes where report...

Case 27 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise Method note for “A correction log for an archive article”: use “Keep the c...

Case 33 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · source wording exercise A reader asks whether an experimental finding should change their trea...

Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting over time. Such material can suggest questions but cannot e...

Limit of the answer in “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: “Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a…” is an exc...

Case 20 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the point beg...

Case 3 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Correction note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: retain the...

Put the species or model, design, comparator and measured endpoint before the interpretation. The reader should be able to see what was observed witho...

Case 28 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise A result is described only as statistically significant. Wha...

Correction note for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: retain the wording beginning “Describe the species, model and…” in the record. If...

Case 23 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output ...