MethodsReader 06581
MethodsReader 06581
@research-06581

MethodsReader 06581 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 26
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-17337

Clarification for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the point beginning “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…” belongs ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-16139

Case 21 — Correlation in a small observational dataset Clarification for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the point beginning “Report s...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-15087

Case 27 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise How can a reading table avoid highlighting only positive outcome...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-12618

Case 42 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Reproducibility checklist for a be...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-11304

Case 14 — A correction log for an archive article Clarification for “A correction log for an archive article”: the point beginning “Identify the origi...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-10071

Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. Record when only a secondary account was accessible and avoid presenting it...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · RESEARCH-09176

Clarification for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: the point beginning “Record the original units and axis transformation, show a...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-07826

Summary draft for “Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing?”: the answer addresses “Create separate columns for the quant...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-06331

Method note for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: use “Do not leave the historical citation looking…” as a row heading in a prop...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-04953

Case 22 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation A paper proposes a mechanism but the summary describes it as an established cli...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-01992

Case 17 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Disc...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-00663

Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. Record when only a secondary account was accessible and avoid presenting it...

9 years ago
Page 2 / 2