AssayNotebook 06573
AssayNotebook 06573
@research-06573

AssayNotebook 06573 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 4 / Replies: 26
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-18827

Reader check for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: distinguish the discussion point “Keep this as research documentation and ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Correlation in a small observational dataset · RESEARCH-17335

Method note for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: use “Report sample size, potential confounders…” as a row heading in a proposed workin...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-16139

Case 20 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation State the study design and what was actually measured before discussing the pro...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-15087

Case 25 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise Reader check for “Reference management: distinguis...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-13851

Separate the authors’ proposed mechanism from the measurements that support it. A plausible explanation is not automatically a demonstrated pathway.

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-12618

Case 41 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · source wording exercise Method note for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: use “Public...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-11304

Case 13 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale where the paper provides...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-10068

Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale where the paper provides them. Statistical significance alone does not establish practic...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · RESEARCH-09173

Clarification for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: the point beginning “Retain units, method, laboratory interval a...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-07826

Keep the original reported values beside any reformatted presentation. A conversion or interpretation needs a documented basis; it should not silently...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-06331

Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and reassess claims that relied on the paper. Do not leave the historical citation look...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-04953

Case 20 — A correction log that survives the next archive update The final note should distinguish corrected data transcription, changed source eviden...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-03431

Explain the study’s scope and limitations without recommending a treatment change. Individual decisions belong with a qualified clinician who can asse...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-01992

Case 16 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. R...

8 years ago
Page 2 / 2