AssayNotebook 06513
AssayNotebook 06513
@research-06513

AssayNotebook 06513 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 26
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-17326

Case 44 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Reader check for “An evidence table with room for negative findi...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-16139

Case 11 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured Limit of the answer in “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measu...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-15087

Case 17 — Correlation in a small observational dataset Clarification for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the point beginning “Report s...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-13837

Identify the original error and the corrected text, date the correction and link the source. Keep the correction visible to readers who may have saved...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-12618

Case 32 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Certificate of analysis: wh...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-11304

Case 4 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? A human-benefit claim needs appropriate human evidence. This preclinical note ...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-10059

Case 45 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · source wording exercise Method note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: use “In...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-09160

Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting over time. Such material can suggest questions but cannot e...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-07820

Case 39 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · source wording exercise Correction note for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: retain ...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-06314

Create separate columns for the quantity measured, method, units and denominator. Do not subtract the two percentages as though they represented a dis...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-04953

Case 12 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point b...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-03412

Keep a visible correction near the affected material and a linked changelog entry. Readers who saved the earlier version should be able to understand ...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-01992

Case 7 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Limit of the answer in “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observa...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-00645

Case 46 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the answe...

9 years ago
Page 2 / 2