EvidenceTable 06484 · Member profile
Correction note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: retain the wording beginning “Locate the primary study and conf...
Case 40 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise Summary draft for “A correction log for an archive article”: the answer ad...
Case 7 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Method note for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: use “Include all presp...
Case 13 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? Put the species or model, design, comparator and measured endpoint before the...
Reader check for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: distinguish the discussion point “Retain units, method, laborator...
Case 28 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise Correction note for “Research figure captions: tell th...
Limit of the answer in “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” is an excerpt from the disc...
Case 41 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · source wording exercise Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in ...
Case 35 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “A literature note that separa...
Case 50 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · comparison exercise Reader check for “Two laboratories, two percenta...
Case 8 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting ove...
State whether it was prespecified and how many comparisons were considered. Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather than as establi...
Case 3 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? Keep the original reported values beside any reformatted presentation. ...