ArchiveReader 06365 · Member profile
Case 23 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible Correction note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: retain th...
Summary draft for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the answer addresses “State whether it was prespecified and how…”; the rela...
Case 31 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Reference management: distingui...
Limit of the answer in “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” is an excerpt from the disc...
Case 11 — A correction log that survives the next archive update Keep a visible correction near the affected material and a linked changelog entry. Re...
Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null findings, exclusions and limitations. Separate the authors’ interpretation from the table’s dir...
Case 24 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? Create separate columns for the quantity measured, method, units and d...
Case 18 — A correction log for an archive article Method note for “A correction log for an archive article”: use “Identify the original error and the ...
Case 33 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · source wording exercise Reader check for “Reading an abstract without skipping the method...
List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with enough detail to understand the method. Keep this as research documentation and d...
Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” b...
Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the point beginning “Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record i...
Case 25 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise Correction note for “Research figure captions: tell th...