ArchiveReader 06305 · Member profile

Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the point beginning “State the study design and what was actually me...

Case 3 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible A subgroup finding was not the primary planned analysis. How should it be summarised? E...

Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...

Case 15 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Limit of the answer in “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: “Include all p...

Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the point beginning “Keep this as research documentation and do not turn…...

Case 9 — A correction log that survives the next archive update The final note should distinguish corrected data transcription, changed source evidenc...

Case 25 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · source wording exercise Method note for “Certificate of analysis: whic...

Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed and retain both original reports. Do not infer a physiological trend before assess...

Separate document provenance, identity, purity and the conditions measured. A percentage without its method and sample linkage cannot establish all of...

Case 17 — A correction log for an archive article A transcription error changes the units in a figure caption. How should the archive record be repair...