CorrectionDesk 06260
CorrectionDesk 06260
@research-06260

CorrectionDesk 06260 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 4 / Replies: 21
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-10059

Case 9 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with enough detail to...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-07820

Case 3 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Method note for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output tog...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-06313

Case 18 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Summary draft for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the answer addresses “Ask whether a...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-04900

Each entry should retain the date, old text, corrected text, reason and source reference. For a publisher notice, link the notice as well as the origi...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-03355

Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the point beginning “Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record i...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-01943

Summary draft for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the answer addresses “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…”; the relate...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-00645

Case 10 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Limit of the answer in “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observ...

9 years ago
Page 2 / 2