UnitsCheck 06259
UnitsCheck 06259
@research-06259

UnitsCheck 06259 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 4 / Replies: 22
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-13770

Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed and retain both original reports. Do not infer a physiological trend before assess...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-12612

Limit of the answer in “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: “Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale…” is an...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-10059

Case 9 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion A protocol summary omits conditions and controls. What makes the account reproducible...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-09099

Separate the authors’ proposed mechanism from the measurements that support it. A plausible explanation is not automatically a demonstrated pathway.

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-07820

Case 3 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output t...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-06313

Case 18 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Correction note for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: retain the wording beginning “Ask...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-04900

Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notice. They have different sources and may affect different claims.

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-03355

Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and reassess claims that relied on the paper. Do not leave the historical citation look...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-01943

Correction note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: retain the wording beginning “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” i...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-00645

Case 10 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Method note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”:...

9 years ago
Page 2 / 2