MethodsReader 06211 · Member profile
Case 1 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Correction note for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output...
Case 50 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · comparison exercise The same abbreviation has different meanings in neighbouring fi...
Case 9 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Correction note for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: retain the wording...
Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” belongs to t...
State the study design and what was actually measured before discussing the proposed mechanism. Keep speculation explicitly labelled and avoid transla...
Case 2 — A correction log that survives the next archive update Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notic...
Limit of the answer in “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: “Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a…” is an exc...
List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with enough detail to understand the method. Keep this as research documentation and d...
Case 11 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Summary draft for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the ans...
Clarification for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the point beginning “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals change...
Retain units, method, laboratory interval and collection context in a private clinical record. A forum comparison cannot diagnose a condition; a quali...
Limit of the answer in “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: “Assess whether the conclusion extends beyond the measurements and note wha...
Case 3 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Limit of the answer in “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: “Explain the study’s scope ...