CorrectionDesk 06040 · Member profile
Case 12 — A correction log that survives the next archive update Keep a visible correction near the affected material and a linked changelog entry. Re...
Case 25 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · source wording exercise Correction note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: ret...
Case 48 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · source wording exercise Two variables move together in a small sample. What would a careful d...
Case 37 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise Correction note for “Reference management: disting...
Correction note for “A correction log that survives the next archive update”: retain the wording beginning “Use separate entries for the internal tran...
Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point beginning “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…” belongs to th...
Case 29 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Data provenance: keep sou...
Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” b...
Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” belongs to t...
Report sample size, potential confounders and measurement uncertainty. Association does not identify direction or causation, and exploratory results n...
Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null findings, exclusions and limitations. Separate the authors’ interpretation from the table’s dir...
Clarification for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the point beginning “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals change...
Case 23 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods A strong abstract conclusion is being discussed without the study methods. What should the ...