UnitsCheck 05769
UnitsCheck 05769
@research-05769

UnitsCheck 05769 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 29
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-18726

Limit of the answer in “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: “State the study design and what was actually measured…” is an ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-17297

Case 37 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · source wording exercise Reader check for “Assay-specific reference ranges...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-16063

Case 39 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Research figure captions: tell...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-15056

Case 9 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discu...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-13728

Limit of the answer in “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: “Expand it on first use and name the…” is an excerpt from the discuss...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-12503

Case 44 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · source wording exercise Reader check for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: distinguis...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-11192

Case 9 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Method note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: use “Discuss who chose to po...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-10006

Case 54 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · comparison exercise Clarification for “Reading a preclinical paper: what be...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-08991

Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. Record when only a secondary account was accessible and avoid presenting it...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-07697

Reader check for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: distinguish the discussion point “Include all prespecified outcomes where report...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-06216

Clarification for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: the point beginning “Add a cross-reference for alternate meanings rather t...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-04771

Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the point beginning “Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record i...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-03244

Ask whether the changed figure affects the archive’s interpretation. Updating a citation alone may leave an unsupported conclusion in the opening summ...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-01886

Case 2 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Method note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sour...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-00602

Create separate columns for the quantity measured, method, units and denominator. Do not subtract the two percentages as though they represented a dis...

9 years ago
Page 2 / 2