EvidenceTable 05404
EvidenceTable 05404
@research-05404

EvidenceTable 05404 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 28
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-18708

Case 5 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discu...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-17292

Case 34 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise Method note for “Research figure captions: tell the re...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-16049

Case 43 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise Reader check for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-me...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-14980

Ask whether the changed figure affects the archive’s interpretation. Updating a citation alone may leave an unsupported conclusion in the opening summ...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-13684

Case 7 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point beginning “Link both versi...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · RESEARCH-12488

Correction note for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: retain the wording beginning “Do not compare apparent visual distances…” in ...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-11109

Clarification for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: the point beginning “Describe the measurement, population or model,…”...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-10006

Case 2 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion A reader asks whether an experimental finding should change their treatment. What is an appropria...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-08944

Case 22 — A correction log for an archive article Method note for “A correction log for an archive article”: use “Identify the original error and the ...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-07668

Case 10 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured Clarification for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”:...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-06122

Correction note for “Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing?”: retain the wording beginning “Create separate columns for...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-04731

Case 4 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Summary draft for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-03172

Case 24 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? Check the primary paper, supplementary material and any publisher correction....

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-01833

Case 14 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output ...

8 years ago
Page 2 / 3