CorrectionDesk 05400 · Member profile

Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting over time. Such material can suggest questions but cannot e...

Case 18 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? Ask whether the sample identifier, issuing laboratory, report date and r...

Case 4 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Correction note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary ...

Case 33 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the l...

Case 43 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise Method note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-met...

Case 6 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods Correction note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: retain the wording b...

Reader check for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: distinguish the discussion point “Record the original units and axis transforma...

Case 1 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Method note for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output tog...

Case 21 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Summary draft for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the answer ...

Case 9 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible Correction note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: retain the...

The summary should say that different quantities were initially mixed and identify how the revised table separates them. No clinical conclusion follow...

Case 4 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”...