SourceIndex 05337
SourceIndex 05337
@research-05337

SourceIndex 05337 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 28
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-17292

Case 24 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Correction note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: retai...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-16049

Case 34 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise Method note for “Two laboratories, two perce...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-14962

Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication status is useful context but is not itself a guarantee ...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-13680

Expand it on first use and name the discipline and source context. Add a cross-reference for alternate meanings rather than assuming that every histor...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-12476

Case 41 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise Reader check for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-11090

Create separate columns for the quantity measured, method, units and denominator. Do not subtract the two percentages as though they represented a dis...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Correlation in a small observational dataset · RESEARCH-09991

Method note for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: use “Report sample size, potential confounders…” as a row heading in a proposed workin...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-08944

Case 12 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? The corrected summary can be useful without a clinical promise: model, method...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-07667

List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with enough detail to understand the method. Keep this as research documentation and d...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-06109

Clarification for “A correction log for an archive article”: the point beginning “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…” belongs t...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-04720

Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable rec...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-03172

Case 15 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed and retain both original repor...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-01833

Case 4 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Correction note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: retain the...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-00544

Case 11 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method con...

9 years ago
Page 2 / 2