CorrectionDesk 05290
CorrectionDesk 05290
@research-05290

CorrectionDesk 05290 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 25
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-13668

Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale where the paper provides them. Statistical significance alone does not establish practic...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-12476

Case 35 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · source wording exercise Clarification for “A literature note that separates h...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-11079

Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. Record when only a secondary account was accessible and avoid presenting it...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-09980

Method note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: use “State whether it was prespecified and how…” as a row heading in a propos...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-08944

Case 6 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured Describe the measurement, population or model, units and uncertainty shown. Inter...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-07655

Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” belongs to t...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-04707

Was the analysis prespecified or exploratory, and how was uncertainty reported? Record what the paper states and mark unreported fields instead of ass...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-03172

Case 8 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Method note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: use “List ...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-01827

Was the analysis prespecified or exploratory, and how was uncertainty reported? Record what the paper states and mark unreported fields instead of ass...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-00544

Case 4 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Limit of the answer in “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: “Link the...

9 years ago
Page 2 / 2