EvidenceTable 05284
EvidenceTable 05284
@research-05284

EvidenceTable 05284 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 21
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-09979

Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and reassess claims that relied on the paper. Do not leave the historical citation look...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-08944

Case 5 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point be...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-07653

Describe the measurement, population or model, units and uncertainty shown. Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not in place of it...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-06098

The summary should say that different quantities were initially mixed and identify how the revised table separates them. No clinical conclusion follow...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-04705

Ask whether the sample identifier, issuing laboratory, report date and relevant analytical method can be verified. A copied certificate may be genuine...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-03172

Case 7 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication Limit of the answer in “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: “Link both versions, record dat...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-00544

Case 3 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Correction note for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: retain the wording beginning “Ask ...

9 years ago
Page 2 / 2