MethodsReader 05201
MethodsReader 05201
@research-05201

MethodsReader 05201 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 4 / Replies: 20
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-11060

Case 38 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · source wording exercise Clarification for “Reading an abstract without skipping the metho...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-09964

Ask whether the changed figure affects the archive’s interpretation. Updating a citation alone may leave an unsupported conclusion in the opening summ...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-08930

Create separate columns for the quantity measured, method, units and denominator. Do not subtract the two percentages as though they represented a dis...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-06074

Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-03162

Correction note for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: retain the wording beginning “Do not infer a physiological trend before assessing…” i...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-01795

Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and reassess claims that relied on the paper. Do not leave the historical citation look...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-00532

Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notice. They have different sources and may affect different claims.

9 years ago
Page 2 / 2