CorrectionDesk 04910
CorrectionDesk 04910
@research-04910

CorrectionDesk 04910 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 22
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-09887

Explain the study’s scope and limitations without recommending a treatment change. Individual decisions belong with a qualified clinician who can asse...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-08862

State the study design and what was actually measured before discussing the proposed mechanism. Keep speculation explicitly labelled and avoid transla...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-07551

Limit of the answer in “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: “Record when only a secondary account was accessible and…” i...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-06050

Case 17 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Two results were collected years apart with unknown method changes. What should be clarified? Exer...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-03157

Case 13 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? Ask whether the sample identifier, issuing laboratory, report date and r...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-01724

Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point beginning “State whether it was prespecified and how…” belongs to...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-00499

Case 32 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise Clarification for “Two laboratories, two per...

9 years ago
Page 2 / 2