CorrectionDesk 04790
CorrectionDesk 04790
@research-04790

CorrectionDesk 04790 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 5 / Replies: 23
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-16019

Case 14 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Correction note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: retain ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-13622

Case 3 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting ove...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-12400

Method note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: use “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records…” as a row he...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-11033

Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null findings, exclusions and limitations. Separate the authors’ interpretation from the table’s dir...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-09852

Summary draft for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the answer addresses “Report effect size, confidence interval and the outco...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-08835

The corrected summary can be useful without a clinical promise: model, methods, endpoint, uncertainty and remaining questions. Link each material stat...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Animal evidence and the limits of translation · RESEARCH-07526

Describe the species, model and outcome actually studied. Differences in biology and study conditions limit translation; the finding is not a clinical...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-06049

The index should list supplied evidence and missing evidence separately. Use method-specific wording rather than a blanket verified or safe label.

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-04575

Summary draft for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the answer addresses “Locate the primary study and confirm that i...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-01690

Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication status is useful context but is not itself a guarantee ...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-00499

Case 15 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods A strong abstract conclusion is being discussed without the study methods. What should the ...

9 years ago
Page 2 / 2