EvidenceTable 04774
EvidenceTable 04774
@research-04774

EvidenceTable 04774 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 5 / Replies: 19
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-11028

Case 55 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · comparison exercise Limit of the answer in “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: “Ask whe...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · RESEARCH-09848

Correction note for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: retain the wording beginning “Record the original units and axis transformat...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-07522

Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication status is useful context but is not itself a guarantee ...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-06047

Explain the study’s scope and limitations without recommending a treatment change. Individual decisions belong with a qualified clinician who can asse...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-04571

List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with enough detail to understand the method. Keep this as research documentation and d...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-03147

A human-benefit claim needs appropriate human evidence. This preclinical note should describe its model and translation limits rather than suggesting ...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-00499

Case 12 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Correction note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observati...

9 years ago
Page 2 / 2