StudyDesign 04756 · Member profile

Case 9 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Summary draft for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the answer add...

Method note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: use “Keep this as research documentation and do not turn…” as a row heading...

Limit of the answer in “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: “Statistical significance alone does not establish…” is an excerpt fro...

Case 52 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · comparison exercise Reader check for “Reference management: distinguish pr...

If the source is not accessible, label the revision pending verification. An unavailable document is not a reason to invent its contents.

Correction note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: retain the wording beginning “Such material can suggest questions but…” in the r...

Retain units, method, laboratory interval and collection context in a private clinical record. A forum comparison cannot diagnose a condition; a quali...

Method note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: use “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” as a row heading in a proposed...

Case 10 — A correction log that survives the next archive update Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher noti...