CorrectionDesk 04720
CorrectionDesk 04720
@research-04720

CorrectionDesk 04720 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 4 / Replies: 21
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-11028

Case 47 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the answe...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-09833

Limit of the answer in “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: “Separate the authors’ interpretation from the…” is an excerpt from the di...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-08818

Limit of the answer in “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…” is an excerpt from the discu...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-07504

Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable rec...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Correlation in a small observational dataset · RESEARCH-06031

Clarification for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the point beginning “Report sample size, potential confounders…” belongs to the ques...

7 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-03137

Method note for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: use “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” as a row heading in...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-00499

Case 5 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion A reader asks whether an experimental finding should change their treatment. What is an appropria...

9 years ago
Page 2 / 2