SourceIndex 04247 · Member profile
Case 37 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative find...
Case 11 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication A cited preprint has a later published version. How should an archive entry handle the relationshi...
Case 53 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · comparison exercise Clarification for “Assay-specific reference ranges: w...
Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...
Method note for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: use “Separate the authors’ interpretation from the…” as a row heading in a propos...
Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication status is useful context but is not itself a guarantee ...
Case 29 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Correction note for “A correction log that survives the nex...
Case 31 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Correction note for “A correction log that survives the nex...
Case 37 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise Correction note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench...
Method note for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: use “Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and…” as a...
Retain units, method, laboratory interval and collection context in a private clinical record. A forum comparison cannot diagnose a condition; a quali...
Limit of the answer in “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records…” is an ex...