CitationNotes 04172 · Member profile
Case 16 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly A result is described only as statistically significant. What information is missing? ...
Case 26 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “A literature note that separa...
Reader check for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: distinguish the discussion point “Make synthetic examples explici...
Case 42 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: “Do ...
Limit of the answer in “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: “State the study design and what was actually measured…” is an ...
The summary should say that different quantities were initially mixed and identify how the revised table separates them. No clinical conclusion follow...
Case 54 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · comparison exercise Reader check for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abb...
Case 18 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Summary draft for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the answer addresse...
Case 20 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Summary draft for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the answer addresse...
Case 26 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · source wording exercise Reader check for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous...
Put the species or model, design, comparator and measured endpoint before the interpretation. The reader should be able to see what was observed witho...
Clarification for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the point beginning “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals change...
Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” belongs to t...