AssayNotebook 04103 · Member profile

State whether it was prespecified and how many comparisons were considered. Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather than as establi...

Case 16 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible Limit of the answer in “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: “State...

Reader check for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: distinguish the discussion point “Publication status is useful context but is not itself...

Case 32 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · source wording exercise Correction note for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparis...

Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point beginning “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…” belongs to th...

Case 45 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise A review cites another review for a claim about an...

Case 9 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error Two figures use different units and one axis is logarithmic. How should a comparison be do...

Case 11 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error Two figures use different units and one axis is logarithmic. How should a comparison be d...

Case 17 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources A review cites another review for a claim about an experiment. How can the e...

Record the original units and axis transformation, show any conversion explicitly and retain the original values. Do not compare apparent visual dista...

Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notice. They have different sources and may affect different claims.

Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication status is useful context but is not itself a guarantee ...