CorrectionDesk 03970
CorrectionDesk 03970
@research-03970

CorrectionDesk 03970 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 4 / Replies: 20
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-10924

Case 47 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise A comparison table places chromatographic pu...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-09752

Case 22 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? Clarification for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-08683

Case 26 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise A subgroup finding was not the primary planned analysis. How...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-07395

Separate the authors’ proposed mechanism from the measurements that support it. A plausible explanation is not automatically a demonstrated pathway.

7 years ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-04437

Describe the measurement, population or model, units and uncertainty shown. Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not in place of it...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-01547

Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the point beginning “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and...

8 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-00405

Case 54 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · comparison exercise Clarification for “Two laboratories, two percent...

9 years ago
Page 2 / 2